FCA decides to investigate the use of personal guarantees given for certain small business lending

On 5 March 2024, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published a press release announcing it is investigating the use of personal guarantees given to lenders to support loans made to certain small businesses. The follows the Federation of Small Businesses making a ‘super-complaint’ to the FCA.

The FCA’s perimeter is, in fact, fairly limited for business lending. It only applies to such lending where (in broad terms):

– the borrower is an individual or a relevant recipient of credit (being a partnership of two or three persons not all of whom are incorporated, or an unincorporated body of persons which does not consist entirely of bodies corporate and is not a partnership); and

– the amount of credit is no more than £25,000.00.

The FCA will:

– collect data between April 2024 and June 2024 to understand when lenders entering into a regulated credit agreement are asking for guarantees;

– review samples of firms’ policies and procedures;

– work with the Financial Ombudsman Service to monitor the level of complaints; and

– consider whether lenders need further guidance in CONC.

The FCA has also published its response to the super complaint.

Financial Conduct Authority decides to take action on certain motor finance commission complaints

🚨 So yesterday was an interesting (and busy) day for motor finance lenders and dealers. Firstly, the FCA decided to intervene into motor finance commission complaints. Secondly, two Ombudsman decisions were published on discretionary commission arrangements entered into before 28 January 2021.

🗞️ So what happened?

✍️ The FCA published a webpage about motor finance commission complaints and a press release too.

✋The FCA has paused the 8 week deadline for responding to motor finance complaints where (a) there was a discretionary commission model in place for an agreement before 28 January 2021 and (b) the complaint was made on or after 17 November. This pause lasts until 25 September 2024.

🤔 The lack of any consultation means there are many unanswered questions. For example, what happens to letters of claim? Is there any impact on litigation cases? And what steps should firms take to investigate paused complaints (the Ombudsman has already been in touch on that!).

🕵️ The FCA is using its powers under Section 166. This means some firms will have a skilled person looking into their practices. We know from our clients that meetings are already being booked in today and on Monday.

🪧 But what has the Ombudsman done?

The Financial Ombudsman Service has issued two detailed decisions from an Ombudsman upholding complaints (and one which was not upheld). They both conclude that discretionary commission models are unfair and the customer should effectively only pay the interest at the rate at which the dealer would receive no commission.

There’s much to say on this but some initial points:

(a) It hard to reconcile that guidance and a principle meant that firms should have done significantly more than CONC 4.5.3R required (either before or after the changes in 2021

(b) The approach bears very little resemblance to our experience of dealing with hundreds of similar claims before the Court.

(c) The proposal on redress takes no account of the complexity and reality of a customer’s decision to get a car on finance.

📋 So, what next?

Given it’s fashionable to do three point slogans then mine is: reflect on the developments, prepare for next steps (including, probably, more customer communications) and clearly decide and implement your strategy.

FCA tells firms to improve their treatment of struggling small business borrowers

On 12 July 2022, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published a press release telling firms to improve their treatment of struggling small business borrowers together with (a) its review into small and medium enterprise collections and recoveries and (b) a ‘Dear Chair’ letter to firms.

The FCA reviewed the practices of eleven banks. It found a number of issues including:

– lenders not treating small businesses fairly when trying to agree sustainable payment plans (for example, arranging clearly unaffordable payment plans);

– staff not having the right training to provide effective support to consumers and to make fair decisions;

– lenders not having clear policies to help staff identify and support vulnerable customers; and

– not having quality assurance and testing for their processes to ensure that they deliver fair results for consumers.

The FCA has given feedback to individual firms. It has also written to the chairs of all retail banks with small business customers. The FCA makes it clear that their ’Dear Chair’ letter is based on the existing principles, rules and guidance. It reminds firms that it will not wait for the introduction of the consumer duty in 2023 to take action where it finds evidence of customer detriment.

The ‘Dear Chair’ letter makes it clear that “all regulated firms offering lending to individuals and relevant recipients of credit (“RRCs”) should consider the findings and recommendations and where necessary, act on them“. The FCA expects “accountable Senior Manager(s) to proactively engage to achieve good practice when overseeing SME collections and recoveries“.

The FCA has set out some of its expectations in the ‘Dear Chair’ letter. These include:

– Where borrowers are treated as if they have a regulated credit agreement, either by requirement or voluntarily, firms should be able to demonstrate they are meeting these standards.

– Policies and procedures are clear with adequate information to support staff to make judgements when required.

– Systems and controls should be arranged to help with the delivery of fair customer outcomes.

– Firms should be able to accurately maintain records and be able to use such records to test whether they have delivered fair outcomes. Firms should also be able to produce customer records without gaps in a timely manner;

– Firms should be able to demonstrate forbearance and due consideration are being offered in accordance with CONC 7.3.4R (where it applies).

– Where CONC 7.2.1R applies, the firm must establish and implement clear, effective and appropriate policies and procedures for the fair and appropriate treatment of customers, who the firm understands, or reasonably suspects, to be vulnerable.

– The management of third parties should be subject to a suitable risk framework that helps ensure fair treatment of SMEs

– The FCA encourages all firms to carry out both quality assurance and customer outcomes testing for customer processes. This assurance should follow a holistic approach so that the customer’s overall outcomes are understood and these are assessed for fairness. There should be clear evidence that root cause analysis is effectively identifying opportunities to improve customer outcomes.

– Staff should receive suitable training that equips them to effectively support SME customers to receive fair outcomes during collections and recoveries.

– Senior management should receive effective MI that allows holistic oversight of SME customer treatment during collections and recoveries

– Senior managers responsible for collections and recoveries should have suitable levels of awareness and oversight of SME customer matters including treatment during collections and recoveries.

The FCA is expected to publish its review of its final findings into firms’ provision of appropriate support to borrowers in financial difficulty both during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, and next steps. This publication is currently expected on Q3 2022.

FCA publishes call for input for its review into change and innovation in the unsecured credit market

Earlier today, on 2 November 2020, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published a call for input asking for views on change and innovation in the unsecured credit market as part of its review on how regulation can better support a healthy unsecured lending market (called the ‘Woolard Review’).

The FCA has also published a dedicated webpage. The deadline for responses is 1 December 2020.

FCA publishes webpage setting out terms of reference for review into change and innovation in the unsecured credit market

On 26 October 2020, the UK Financial Conduct Authority updated its webpage on its review into change and innovation in the unsecured credit market. This review will be led by Christopher Woolard.

The review will look at:

– how regulation can better support a healthy unsecured lending market; and

– the impact of COVID-19 on employment security and credit scores, changes in business models and new developments in the unsecured lending (including the growth in point of sale unregulated products).

The webpage sets out the review’s terms of reference. These are:

– To examine the current state of the unsecured credit market in the UK including the component parts, recent changes in size and scale, whether in regulated or in adjacent unregulated products.

– To examine changes in regulation, noting those areas that have been subject to regulatory oversight in recent years from a variety of bodies including the FCA (for example overdrafts or high cost credit), and comparing likely harms or dynamic effects seen in those areas.

– To examine the immediate effect of coronavirus on demand for unsecured credit and on the role of credit information.

– To report on possible trends and potential future pressures.

– To identify areas of growth in demand from consumers for credit including from non-traditional providers of credit.

– To present an assessment of the benefits and harms evident in the market and those that may be expected as the market develops.

– To compare international approaches to these issues where relevant.

– To make conclusions and recommendations to the FCA Board on management of harms in this sector; gaps in understanding or data; potential changes in regulation for the FCA to consider; advice on potential changes to the overall system the FCA may wish to consider with other authorities or the Government; and possible innovations to support a sustainable market.