FCA publishes a statement on key considerations for any consumer redress scheme for motor finance commissions

Earlier today, on 5 June 2025, the FCA published a statement entitled ‘Key considerations in implementing a possible motor finance consumer redress scheme’. 

The key points from the statement are:

– If the FCA proposes “an industry-wide consumer redress scheme“, it’ll set out rules on how to assess claims and calculate redress.  The aim of the scheme would be to make it “easy for consumers to understand and participate in, without needing to use a claims management company (CMC) or law firm“.

– The FCA has been “speaking with consumer groups, firms and industry trade bodies to get their views on important issues to consider if we do introduce a redress scheme“.  If the FCA decides to propose a redress scheme, it’ll consult on why and explain how it thinks a scheme could work. 

– Given the pre-consultation engagement, the FCA “may decide to have a shorter than normal consultation window (for example, 6 weeks)“.

– There will be seven key principles:

(1) comprehensiveness: the scheme should be as wide “as possible so consumers don’t have to go elsewhere, like court“;

(2) fairness: the approach (both on breach and redress) should be “fair to consumers and firms“;

(3) certainty: providing finality for both firms and consumers;

(4) simplicity and cost effectiveness: easy for consumers to participate and the cost of delivering the scheme should be proportionate for firms;

(5) timeliness: resolve the majority of claims “within a reasonable timeframe“;

(6) transparency: consumers should receive clear explanations of decisions and data on the progress of the scheme should be publicly available; and

(7) market integrity: support the ongoing, long-term availability of high quality, competitively-priced motor finance.

– The FCA acknowledges that there can be tensions between these principles and it will aim to get the balance right.

– Scope of a redress scheme: some features to consider are: (a) opt-in or opt out and (b) calculating redress must be “fair to consumers who’ve lost out” and “ensure the integrity of the motor finance market” (and the FCA acknowledges it has seen some “highly speculative figures by some CMCs and law firms“)

– The FCA continues to say that it’ll “confirm within 6 weeks of the Supreme Court judgment whether we’re proposing to introduce a redress scheme. If so, we’ll also set out timings for when we would issue a consultation“.

– If the FCA proposes to introduce a scheme, the final rules for any scheme would “be in 2026“.  The FCA is also keeping under review whether to make any changes to its Handbook.

FCA makes rules and guidance extending pause for handing complaints about motor finance discretionary commission arrangements

On 24 September 2024, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA) published a press release and Policy Statement 24/11: ‘Extending the temporary changes to handling rules for motor finance complaints’ (PS24/11). PS24/11 effectively implements the changes proposed by Consultation Paper 24/15: ‘Extending the temporary changes to handling rules for motor finance complaints’.

The changes to DISP Appendix 5 come into force 26 September 2024.

The key changes are:

– the pause on the requirement for firms to provide a final response to DCA complaints within 8 weeks, giving complainants the right to go to the Financial Ombudsman (which was due to end on 25 September 2024) will be extended to 4 December 2025 (see DISP App 5.2.1R(2));

– there are new requirements on keeping consumers informed about the pause (see DISP App 5.2.5AR to DISP App 5.2.5CR);

– the timeframe for consumers who receive a final response on relevant complaints to decide whether to refer their complaint to the Financial Ombudsman is extended to 29 July 2026 (at the earliest) (see DISP App 5.2.9R(3)); and

– requirements to maintain and preserve relevant records will remain in place until 11 April 2026 (see DISP App 5.3.1R(2)(b)).

There are some interesting points for firms:

– the FCA makes it clear that PS24/11 is relevant to “motor finance providers” and “motor finance credit brokers, including motor dealers“;

– the FCA’s view is that neither the original pause, nor these changes, “prevent consumers or their representatives from … taking legal action“;

– the ongoing judicial review (which is due to be heard between 15 and 17 October 2024), and the Court of Appeal cases dealing with commissions (where judgment is reserved), are relevant to the FCA’s decision making; and

– because “many motor finance agreements involving DCAs were made, or ended, more than 6 years ago, it is likely that the 3-year rule [on time-barring] will be more relevant for consumers“.

FCA publishes policy statement and finalised guidance on its Consumer Duty for retail firms

On 27 July 2022, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published a press release, a webpage, a policy statement and finalised guidance on its consumer duty for retail firms. The FCA is clear that it will “set higher and clearer standards of consumer protection across financial services and require firms to put their customers’ needs first“.

Together with my fellow partners, Noline Matemera and Robin Penfold, we’ve prepared a one page infographic on six key takeaways:

There is no doubt that there is a lot of work for firms to do between now and implementation.

Butterworths Financial Regulation Service – updated commentary on CONC published

Issue 115 of Butterworths Financial Regulation Service has now been published. I’ve reviewed and revised the existing chapters in CONC. The commentary is up to date to December 2020.

The changes include:

– revising the commentary to reflect latest COVID-19 guidance from the FCA;

– updating the commentary to consider the changes to commission disclosure, including analysing the meaning of the ‘nature’ of commission; and

– considering the changes to CONC as a result of Brexit.

Financial Ombudsman Service publishes latest edition of ‘Ombudsman News’

On 28 October 2020, the Financial Ombudsman Service (the Ombudsman Servicepublished its latest edition of ‘Ombudsman News’.

This edition includes:

– a blog setting out how it is ‘helping small businesses with life-changing financial disputes’;

– a blog on the impact of COVID-19 on financial services complaints and SMEs; and

– the Ombudsman Service’s half-yearly complaints data (including a slight increase on the number of non-PPI complaints received in the last reporting period).

Issue 63 of Goode: Consumer Credit Law and Practice published with new chapter on ancillary credit business and credit reporting

Issue 63 of Goode: Consumer Credit Law and Practice has now been published. This includes a new chapter 48, written by me, on ancillary credit business and credit reporting. It was rather humbling when Professor Sir Roy Goode QC invited me to join the editorial team a few years ago and it’s great to see my first chapter being published.

I’ve also written four new case reports: these appear in Goode: Consumer Credit Reports.

FCA publishes policy statement banning motor finance discretionary commission models and making minor changes to commission disclosure rules

Earlier today, on 28 July 2020, the FCA published a policy statement, PS20/8, banning motor finance discretionary commission models and making minor changes to commission disclosure rules. The FCA also published a press release.

My one page summary is (and you can see a bigger version if you click on it):

If you want a pdf copy, please get in touch: russell.kelsall@TLTsolicitors.com.

HM Treasury publishes policy statement on changes the Government proposes to make to the process of cancelling an authorisation from the Financial Conduct Authority

Earlier this week, on 20 July 2020, HM Treasury published a policy statement setting out the changes the Government proposes to make on the process for cancelling an authorisation from the UK Financial Conduct Authority.

The Government plans to take forward these measures when Parliamentary time allows.

These changes will only impact firms regulated by the FCA (and not dual regulated firms).

Butterworths Financial Regulation Service – new and updated commentary on CONC published

Issue 111 of Butterworths Financial Regulation Service has now been published.  I’ve reviewed and revised the introductory chapter on CONC and the chapters on CONC 1 to 4, 5A to 5D and 9. I’ve also written new material including:

– a new chapter on CONC 7 (including looking at the impact of the FCA’s COVID-19 related temporary measures); and

– a new chapter on CONC 11 (dealing with cancellation of certain agreements)

The commentary on Division 4H is now up to date to April 2020.